The days when the Regional Administrative Courts, in assessing any appeals against the rejection of a student, verify that the procedures, the consistency of decisions and the proper application of the rules, overriding the decisions of the boards of class only for errors of law.
merit, ie the evaluation of teachers, it was almost never questioned.
For some 'time loop instead of a different air in the Administrative Courts and now it happens frequently that the courts take the place of teachers in assessing pupils, promoting office advice from students who had class the other hand, justifiably, not admitted to the next class.
The Tar Lazio, in recent interviews, has embarked on some sort of precedent that are heading in that direction. After the case, also reported by Tuttoscuola, a seventh grade pupil who was rejected by the high number of five different disciplines of study, but instead has promoted the Tar, because those numerous deficiencies were not serious (ie not were the four or three), there is also the case of a student's high school, also rejected because, despite having missed out enough throughout the year, had not reached the coveted six.
For the latter, the Tar, the order of 11 November 4930, felt that she deserved the test call (poll in September) that its the teachers had denied.
The Court therefore ordered that address now the question because his recovery is established in the disciplines of study in which was found to be insufficient in June. Not trusting the teachers, the administrative court has also ordered that the examination is conducted in the presence of an inspector from the ministry of education.
____
Ladies and gentlemen of the site that "giving reasons" seems out of place, "serious and widespread deficiencies" have you ever heard about it? WTF ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment