CONTINUE 
Here are the statement of the Deputy Mayor Egle Cena, read at: serravalleweb.com:
Egle Cena The deputy mayor, on the now famous story of the camera, with a speech intended to put some key points and clarify the steps of history.
"In this story have been told lies and used inappropriate words too lightly. This will go beyond the political debate by creating situations heavy. Sometimes you need to put some fixed points. The election program of our coalition was the idea of \u200b\u200bestablishing an effective control of the territory through a series of cameras monitoring carried out in an appropriate manner as required. It was a priority right from the beginning and made quick times. Its success is remarkable, so much so that we are thinking about broadening the network of cameras to get control over an increasing number of hotspots in the area. In the previous administration had reasoned in similar terms, but the project is regularly assigned to the process of making one of the members of the junta, and that is no longer in office, for a variety of situation has not evolved in line with expectations for a number of technical problems which were subsequently addressed and resolved under the system now in operation. "
"In practice, a surveillance camera installed near the park would have to keep images in vandal-proof function. Upon installation, it was not possible to get a result at the level of image compatible with the expectations, it was decided to postpone the installation itself, waiting for a better level of connection. On this basis, have not been installed signs that warn of video surveillance in place, and even appointed a manager of the database containing the images are not tests were performed (since this type of equipment is not providing for them, being a just a check of compliance with the European Union) because it is seen immediately as the camera, not linked as expected to a special antenna receiver but instead connected to Hot Spot of the square, in those conditions was not able to provide adequate images, too grainy and unclear. The choice not to see a plant material with a total value of damaged or go into disuse, was to leave in place the only air-conditioned enclosure of the camera, also act as a deterrent (the function that has been successful for a long time). "
'On the basis of a request made by the Great Council (which, incidentally, was responsible for the previous junta of that installation process), I contacted our technical advisor for the installation, I replied, assuming you were aware of the situation camera, the images, referring to those of tests carried out were inappropriate. Based on information I received in reply. If my answer from someone in the council was entitled to conclude that we were in possession of images of specific acts of vandalism, I am sincerely sorry for the misunderstanding and for the misunderstanding, but we could not have those pictures still be legally held. In any case, it is not installed a camera off, or not working, since this material is stored before being used in the new video surveillance system, designed to send images to the municipal police and implement an effective territorial control (which in recent months has already given interesting results) but only a protective cover, because it was not possible with that setup, get the expected result. And we hope to include in future, with an expansion of video surveillance, and other sensitive points of the territory. "
I am continuing to pinch to see if I'm dreaming or if I am awake.
fully agree with the Deputy Mayor said, "In this story these were false and incorrect terms used too lightly, but the fault is yours dear Cena, You said only terms used false or incorrect.
Everything else makes me sincerely hope to wake up and believe I dreamed the answer, You do have a pride in the electoral program of the installation of cameras for the effective control of the area? But you are not the same as the proposal of the then National Alliance Club (proposal made after a meeting with the Citizens), were firmly convinced, at meetings of the committee in this regard, the futility of video surveillance, there was indeed the risk of going to harm privacy of citizens?, now I feel a "remarkable success, so that we are thinking about broadening the network of cameras to get control over an increasing number of sensitive points of the territory" What has changed? What time do you boast of an idea, certainly not decisive, but effective, but it came from the "adversarial" and then had to fight?.
regard to the camera "under investigation"? maybe you were the commissioner of public works during the installation of the same? Did not go to "your desktop" installation of the false report on the camera or otherwise not functioning properly? I do not want to believe you have not followed the progress of the problem. And anyway, "was seen immediately as the camera is not connected as expected but instead to a special receiving antenna connected to Hot Spot of the square, in those conditions was not able to provide adequate images, too grainy and unclear" and those who noticed it immediately if the Councillor "competent"? Assuming
(not granted) that the statements are true of the response of the Deputy Mayor, I imagine the discussion on the preparation of the answer to questions related to the Great Council, "Mr expert, gives me clarification of the vandalism of the spring 2010 Parchin in the city? " and the "phantom expert" who responds with "proof of registration" a few years back. But it has a name that expert? By what technical preparation has been given charge if he does not understand when we talk of 2010 or a few years back?.
was not misunderstood the answer, the misunderstanding is assumed that those who have exposed and who should implement well exposed, has implemented badly, this is a lie, or making a sentence read in my discussion on a website about it, is climbing on mirrors with two wet bars of soap in hand.
Grillanda Stefano
